<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Statbot - Latest Comments in Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thestatbot.disqus.com/statbot_visits_scoble_at_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:03:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-38270105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These came at an average of 20 tweet per day (explained below), 16.5 words per tweet, 97 chars per tweet and 103 keystrokes per tweet. Still, just about half as many chars as found on his Wordpress blog when I last profiled it more than a year ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Georgia Bulldogs Jersey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-36110278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In short, he’s totally erratic – see the huge spikes followed by the flat and low worms. He is going ballistic in 2008 though – He has 4693, or 44% of his tweets, in 2008, at an average of 40 per day, which is double his overall average :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Amazon Vouchers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-36109893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These came at an average of 20 tweet per day (explained below), 16.5 words per tweet, 97 chars per tweet and 103 keystrokes per tweet. Still, just about half as many chars as found on his Wordpress blog when I last profiled it more than a year ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Amazon Vouchers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:00:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-35650535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still, just about half as many chars as found on his Wordpress blog when I last profiled it more than a year ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free xBox Live</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-35617653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s another slow period during May-Jul 2007, and another one between Mid Oct-Dec 07. In short, he’s totally erratic – see the huge spikes followed by the flat and low worms. He is going ballistic in 2008 though –&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stream Lost Online</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:22:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-34711097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s another slow period during May-Jul 2007, and another one between Mid Oct-Dec 07. In short, he’s totally erratic – see the huge spikes followed by the flat and low worms. He is going ballistic in 2008 though – He has 4693, or 44% of his tweets, in 2008, at an average of 40 per day, which is double his overall average :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ohio State Buckeyes Shirt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:01:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-34263557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;n short, he’s totally erratic – see the huge spikes followed by the flat and low worms. He is going ballistic in 2008 though – He has 4693, or 44% of his tweets, in 2008, at an average of 40 per day, which is double his overall average :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook Login</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-34255623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For almost four months after starting the account on November 20th, it remained dormant: Until the end of February, there were only 114 tweets, at a dismal average of 1.1 tweet a day. There’s another slow period during May-Jul 2007, and another one between Mid Oct-Dec 07.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook Login</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-33277059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For almost four months after starting the account on November 20th, it remained dormant: Until the end of February, there were only 114 tweets, at a dismal average of 1.1 tweet a day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Life in Sydney</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-32629441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The dataset used consists of 10,598 tweets from &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/scobleizer" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/scobleizer"&gt;http://twitter.com/scobleizer&lt;/a&gt;, spanning 523 days (till April 27th 2008, when this was written), with 175,543 words, 1,026,899 chars, and 1,095,406 keystrokes!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Djarum Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-32310189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this reminds me of viewing awstats vs. google analytics. a big difference&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sebastin Tu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-30268504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow that is interesting stats for twitter. social media is quit interesting. I wished there were more stats released like your share. Good for anayltics and readership understanding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tinnitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-25596055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a nut-shell explanation of tweeter, please upload anything like that on facebook!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miami web design</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-21832536</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Waoo are those info for real? where can I check this too&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-16554333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is really a good information especially to those member of Twitter.. I wonder where did you get this graphs and data..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miami website design</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statbot visits Scoble at Twitter</title><link>http://thestatbot.com/2008/05/01/twitter-analysis-robert-scoble/#comment-6838675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;incredible log. I remember when I joined twitter, my first day log was pretty high and than I just lost it. I really wanna know the trick, how to manage so extensive web presence. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Web Design</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:01:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>