The Statbot - Latest Comments in Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Djarum Black — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:36:59 -0000

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

davidbaer — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:52:11 -0000

Having been a part of the Online Universal Work Marketing team for 4 months now, I’m thankful for my fellow team members who have patiently shown me the ropes along the way and made me feel welcome

www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

davidbaer — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:50:58 -0000

Having been a part of the Online Universal Work Marketing team for 4 months now, I’m thankful for my fellow team members who have patiently shown me the ropes along the way and made me feel welcome

www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

SEO — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:37:04 -0000

Many of the links are broken, many are not showing "nofollow" tag and remaining have no rank..

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

gregorylent — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:15:23 -0000

try to have lunch tomorrow with rajnikanth or kamal hassan ... you will learn what a-list really is

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

ajbatac — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:40:46 -0000

Got the email Yuvi, really cool! ;)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:35:54 -0000

Here you go - I hope you get this email:
<ol>
<li>Mashable! - 0.131% (131 posts)</li>
<li>TechCrunch - 0.126% (126 posts)</li>
<li>VentureBeat - 0.116% (116 posts)</li>
<li>ReadWriteWeb - 0.071% (71 posts)</li>
<li>The Inquisitr - 0.047% (47 posts)</li>
<li>WebWorkerDaily - 0.044% (44 posts)</li>
<li>CenterNetworks - 0.043% (43 posts)</li>
<li>GigaOM - 0.043% (43 posts)</li>
<li>Gizmodo - 0.02% (20 posts)</li>
<li>Google Blogoscoped - 0.019% (19 posts)</li>
<li>louisgray.com - 0.019% (19 posts)</li>
<li>CrunchGear - 0.017% (17 posts)</li>
<li>WebResourcesDepot - 0.016% (16 posts)</li>
<li>Startup Meme - 0.014% (14 posts)</li>
<li>FirstShowing.net - 0.01% (10 posts)</li>
<li>WebAppers - 0.01% (10 posts)</li>
<li>Lifehacker - 0.01% (10 posts)</li>
<li>Smashing Magazine - 0.009% (9 posts)</li>
<li>Seth's Blog - 0.009% (9 posts)</li>
<li>FriendFeedLinks - Home - 0.008% (8 posts)</li>
<li>Loic Le Meur Blog - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>The Apple Blog - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>Quick Online Tips - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>Engadget - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>Ajaxian A¯ Front Page - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>Scobleizer -- Tech geek blogger - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>Technology Bites - 0.007% (7 posts)</li>
<li>The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) - 0.006% (6 posts)</li>
<li>DaPino-Colada - 0.006% (6 posts)</li>
<li>GO2WEB20 Blog - 0.006% (6 posts)</li>
<li>O'Reilly Radar - Insight, analysis, and research about emerging technologies - 0.005% (5 posts)</li>
<li>ProBlogger Blog Tips - 0.005% (5 posts)</li>
<li>Matt Cutts: Gadgets, Google, and SEO - 0.005% (5 posts)</li>
<li>Vandelay Website Design - 0.005% (5 posts)</li>
<li>good coders code, great reuse - 0.005% (5 posts)</li>
<li>SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>Brand New - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>Tech Blog - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>Boing Boing - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>Yahoo! Developer Network blog - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>MySQL Performance Blog - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>OnStartups - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>woork - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>TorrentFreak - 0.004% (4 posts)</li>
<li>Apple Gazette - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
<li>Cult of Mac - News and opinion about the Mac and iPod communities - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
<li>0x000000 Security - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
<li>SEO BlackHat: Black Hat SEO Blog - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
<li>SEO Book.com - - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
<li>Shoemoney - Skills To Pay The Bills - 0.003% (3 posts)</li>
</ol>

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Shey — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:05:29 -0000

Ah! In that case, request withdrawn! Thanks ::)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

ajbatac — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:30:40 -0000

Request? http://www.google.com/reade...

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:49:27 -0000

Request denied! You're already on the Round II list ;)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Shey — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:47:52 -0000

Request! http://www.google.com/reade...

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Svetlana Gladkova — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:52:53 -0000

You are making perfect sense here, perfectly correct about Robert Scoble being celebrities now, not A-listers. And I still hope Louis will not drop the communications any time soon - it will damage a number of communities, most of all FriendFeed heavily. And I think interactivity strongly depends on the person - Scoble is definitely very interactive for a celebrity and there are some other examples as well.

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:09:50 -0000

A-List != Internet/Blog Celeb, right? Scoble/Kevin Rose are Internet/Blog Celebs now, not A-Listers. They don't have time to interact, and can't fault them. Louis Gray is an A-Lister now - he will perhaps soon become a celeb and be too busy to interact. And someone else will take his place - and the cycle moves on. As long as we can differentiate between Internet Celebs (one way) and A-Listers, I think we're good to go :) Scoble is quite interactive for a Celeb, btw.

Am I making sense or being stupid here?

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Svetlana Gladkova — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:52:47 -0000

You know what, I have my own concerns about it. I don't really think that those current A-listers who fail to interact with anyone beyond their circle behave like this out of their ill will. I suspect that they really must be extremely busy working first to reach and then to maintain their position. So chances are they would really love talking to someone new but they just can't find time for it even if they stop sleeping at all. I am not sure how true my concerns are and I also hope that anyone who is truly willing to communicate will do so.

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:42:42 -0000

That's perhaps the point - the new order is 'new' 'coz it has new people who are open to other new/ordinary people and new/ordinary ideas.

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Svetlana Gladkova — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:36:52 -0000

Hm, I guess I'll have to like it after all since Profy is included in the A-list of the new order :) And seriously I don't think there's anything wrong with the A-list itself, if only some of the A-listers were more open to ordinary people, it would be just fine.

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:14:41 -0000

The term "A-Lister" by itself isn't bad - if you take away the negative, arrogant connotation it has, you'll like it :)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Svetlana Gladkova — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:04:37 -0000

Great job, someone should have done this finally and thank you for the efforts! I love the new order though I don't like the "A-lister" as a term.

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

Yuvi Panda — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:41:42 -0000

Fixed :) So much for blogging in unearthly hours :)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

reechard — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:28:23 -0000

ok I'm not crazy :-)

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

reechard — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:27:46 -0000

Hey wait a minute there Batman!
All the links start with
http://http://
so they are broken! :-(

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

atul — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:25:05 -0000

Yuvi - small problem. URLs are all funky/broken in the list above. All of them have an extra http//

Re: Google Reader Shared Items Leaderboards - Round I

charlieanzman — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:10:09 -0000

Agree - We need some more women! Well, there's definitely a lot of content here, and, in my case, was actually surprised (usually am). Nice job Yuvi!